Oct. 2: A Double Team Review: Wrecked
"A man trapped in a car wreck at the bottom of a ravine must overcome incredible odds to survive."
Directed by: Michael Greenspan, Rated: R, 91 minutes
So I have done a couple of Double Team Reviews at this point, both of them with Joe from Two Dude Review. This time around, I'm teaming up with David Gilleand who writes for Examiner.com and can be found here, on his Facebook page. Today we're discussing the 2010, Adrien Brody survival thriller, Wrecked. Below, I am in blue and David is in green.
N: Okay, so what are your initial thoughts on Wrecked?
D: I really liked the film's level of
suspense, Adrien Brody did a great job at portraying his character as
always, and thought it had great pacing. How about you?
N: I thought it had moments of
brilliance, but there were a lot of problems with it for me, such as
random animals popping up everywhere and what not. I did really enjoy
Brody's performance though. When he's the only guy on the screen he
has to bring it, and I feel he really did.
D: Of course. I had one major issue
with it, and that was if he was in the middle of a vast forest, why
he couldn't simply get a couple of logs to use as clutches instead of
crawling around the entire way through.
N: That is a good point. I kind of
wondered that, but then just went with it. Crawling around, I guess,
adds to the suspense and desperation he was suffering through?
D: I could see it that way, I just try
to find the difference between metaphors like that and realism. So I
am on the fence there.
When has crawling through a forest ever been a good idea?
N: What did you think of the overall
story of the film? There's not a lot at the heart of it, with most of
the reveals being in the final scene of the movie.
D: I think because there wasn't a whole
lot, it added to the suspense, and that's just not something we see
everyday in movies, and it is good to step away from the usual to get
an audience reeled into another perspective.
N: Speaking of perspective, the first
twenty minutes or so, with Brody trapped in a car in a ditch, was all
we saw. Everything from his crowded little perspective. Did you think
that was done well? It's hard not to compare something like this to
say, Buried. Although it wasn't as claustrophobic, I felt it really
was closing in all around.
D: I wasn't a fan of Buried apart from
the overall idea of shooting an entire movie in one place with one
person, but I think they did it particularly well in this one. Brody
is really a great actor, and he prepared for this movie by staying
out in Canadian woods in the winter, stuck in the car while the rest
of the crew went to the hotel. You really have to give the guy credit
for that. I really think that added to the believability to his
situation, which in turn made the film that much better.
N: Certainly. This film could have
easily been thrown out the window had the lead actor been somebody
else. Brody carries the movie completely.
D: Come to think of it, I can't
remember the last time I disliked any role I have seen him play.
N. Yeah! Me too. It's just a shame that
after his recognition for The Pianist, the guy's kind of faded off
into nothing. He's a great actor.
Brody: "I won an Oscar and all I got was the lousy Predators". Seriously, how is this guy not in more big time stuff?
N. So, researching the film, I see that
on IMDB it has a 5.1/10. While I felt that Wrecked is much more
deserving than that score. What issues did you have with it that
could explain such a low score by so many people?
D: I am guessing that because
everyone's taste is different, some may not have been able to sense
the suspense. It could be seen as repetitive I could see someone
saying "Okay, I get it, he's stuck. Get on with it".
N: True. Like I mentioned, the biggest
complaint I had were the animals. The film really wanted to focus on
a realism behind what Brody's character's situation is, but having
random homicidal mountain lions pop up really pissed me off.
D: I never really thought about it. He
was in the wilderness, things were bound to show up to add to that
suspense, but you're right. Reminds me of how everyone complained
about the cougar episode of 24.
N: That's the first thing I thought of!
Thinking that f**king Kim Bauer was hiding somewhere.
D: This was definitely a spin-off.
N: Haha.
N: What did you think of the overall
look of the film?
D: I think the massive size of the
forest, and the fact that he went in circles was done very well. It
was filmed in actual woods, so it looks real because it is. I never
had any issues with the blood in the movie, and I often do. I guess
the overall look had no flaws for me, what about you?
N: I really liked the look too. I've
always been a fan of survival movies and I think this one captured the
woods really well. And I agree, the blood looked good. It was that
dark, realistic looking kind, and not that corn syrup and red food
coloring look you see in a lot of low budget movies.
D: Which is why when I make movies, I
stay away from the blood aspect.
The blood effects actually look real. Something you rarely find in films with this kind of budget. Thank God.
D: Well you said you are a fan of
survival movies, so I guess how would you compare this to other
survival movies?
N: I think Wrecked is up there,
honestly. Sure, it's not as showy as a lot of the other ones, like
The Edge, The Grey, or even 127 Hours, but it's still pretty suspenseful The added plot-line that he can't remember anything that
happened before the crash is also something new, that makes it more
of a mystery thriller than a straight up horror movie.
D: Yeah I agree. I always like to say
that presentation is key, not how big of a budget a movie has. I am a
fan of survival films too, and I am really glad I saw this movie. I
still think 127 Hours takes the cake, but this is up there as well.
N: To wrap things up then, what score
would you give this movie on a scale of 1-10?
D: I'll give it an 8.
N: And what is your favorite part of
the film?
D: Normally, I would say the end
reveal, but my personal favorite part is when he finally got the dog
to warm up to him.
N: I liked that part too. The look on
his face when he realized he needed to share the tiny piece of beef
jerky was genuine. I would give the movie a 7.4 out of 10. I thought
the movie is filmed well and that Brody absolutely nails it with his
performance.
Wrecked is a great little film that deserves your attention. It's slower than most movies of the survival genre, but it's beautifully shot and has an incredible actor in the leading role. It also packs a little mystery, with Brody's character waking up not knowing who he is. As we struggle along with him in his attempt to find rescue, we also begin to wonder what kind of man he is and what he was doing before the car crash. I would definitely recommend the film.
The Good:
Adrian Brody delivering an exceptional performance, being the only man on screen for 90% of the film
The Bad:
homicidal mountain lions that pop up for no real reason but to add more suspense to something that's strong enough on its own without it
The Ugly:
the fact this movie isn't getting as much love as I believe it deserves, it's really good
Overall: 7.4/10
Trailer:
Want to team up with me for a future Double Team Review? Comment below with ideas or reach out to me on Twitter @CineKatz
Labels: 2010, adrien brody, double team review, Wrecked
2 Comments:
Consider this one added to my Netflix queue, my friends!
Glad to see someone else giving it a shot! Let us know what you think!
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home